Transfusion Medicine

Preparation and Testing

TM-PT

Preparation and Testing is where the transfusion laboratory does most of its work: turning a labelled tube and a bag of red cells into a defensible decision about whether the two belong together. It covers sample acceptance, reagent and control preparation, grouping and antibody detection, phenotyping, compatibility testing and the inspection of the products themselves. Where a serious reaction is traced to the laboratory rather than to the bedside, the failure is usually a shortcut taken somewhere in this domain. Preparation and Testing is one of the eight competency areas assessed in the Transfusion Medicine Fields-of-Practice examination set by CAMLPR.

TM-PT-1

Tying the sample back to the patient

Before any grouping or compatibility work starts, the technologist must be satisfied that the tube on the bench came from the patient named on the request. That means comparing the label with the requisition and the patient's identification band, confirming the collector's initials and the date and time of collection, and refusing anything unlabelled, mislabelled or altered at the bedside. Most Canadian laboratories also require a second, independently collected sample before group-specific red cells go out to a patient with no historical ABO record. Mistakes at this step are the commonest route to an ABO-incompatible transfusion.

Two units of red cells are ordered for a 34-year-old woman admitted ahead of elective surgery. The transfusion laboratory holds no previous ABO record for her. Her sample groups cleanly as A Rh positive on both forward and reverse testing. What must happen before group A units are issued?

A tube arrives in the transfusion laboratory for a group and screen. It carries a matching surname and birth date, but the identification number printed on the tube differs by one digit from the requisition. What is the correct action?

TM-PT-2

Getting reagents and controls ready for use

Serological results are only as good as the materials behind them. This area covers preparing and handling antisera, reagent red cells, enhancement media and control materials: checking lot numbers and expiry dates, inspecting vials for haemolysis, turbidity or contamination, letting reagents reach the temperature the product insert specifies, and making cell suspensions at the concentration the method requires. Positive and negative controls are run before patient samples each day and whenever a new lot is opened. Every lot, expiry date and control outcome is recorded, and a reagent that fails its control is quarantined rather than used.

A technologist is preparing a patient's red cells for antibody screening by the column agglutination (gel) method. The manufacturer's insert calls for a dilute suspension made in the diluent supplied with the cards. Which cell suspension should be prepared?

Daily quality control on a newly opened lot of anti-D reagent gives no reaction with the D-positive control cell, while the D-negative control cell is correctly non-reactive. Several patient samples are waiting for Rh typing. What should the technologist do?

TM-PT-5

Knowing where a method stops working

Every serological method has a blind spot, and knowing where it lies is part of the job. Immediate-spin testing will not find warm IgG antibodies; gel and tube methods differ in sensitivity; enhancement media change what is detected. A recent transfusion produces mixed cell populations that make serological phenotyping unreliable, a positive direct antiglobulin test can mask an alloantibody, and screening cells may lack low-incidence antigens altogether. The technologist has to recognise when a negative result cannot rule an antibody out, and when to move on to an extended panel, adsorption, enzyme treatment or molecular typing.

A patient transfused four days ago now needs an extended red cell phenotype so that antigen-negative units can be chosen. Serological typing with anti-Jk(a) gives a clear mixed-field reaction. Which approach will give a reliable answer for this patient?

An antibody screen and all eleven panel cells react 2+ at the antiglobulin phase, and the autocontrol reacts just as strongly [TABLE]. The patient has not been transfused for more than a year. Which technique is most likely to reveal an alloantibody hiding underneath?

TM-PT-10

Making slides worth looking at

Slide work in the transfusion laboratory has two main uses. The first is resolving a doubtful tube reading: the cell button is transferred gently to a slide and examined so that true agglutination can be told apart from rouleaux, fibrin strands or debris. The second is the acid elution film used to estimate a foetomaternal haemorrhage, where a thin, even smear, correct fixation and staining times, and a control slide containing known foetal cells are all needed before any count is credible. Poor spreading or over-fixation ruins the count long before the microscope is switched on.

An acid elution (Kleihauer-Betke) film is prepared on an Rh negative mother after delivery to estimate the size of a foetomaternal bleed. Under the microscope, which appearance identifies the foetal cells that are to be counted?

A reverse grouping tube appears to be agglutinated. Transferred to a slide, the cells lie in long stacks that resemble piles of coins, and the patient's total protein is markedly raised. Which procedure will confirm that this appearance is not true agglutination?

TM-PT-21

Judging whether the sample is fit to test

A sample that is not fit for purpose cannot give a safe answer. The technologist checks that the correct tube type was drawn, that the volume reaches the fill line so the anticoagulant ratio is right, that an EDTA sample is free of clots, and that the draw is recent enough for the testing being asked for. Where a patient has been transfused or pregnant within the previous three months, the sample must usually be no more than 96 hours old, because a new antibody may have appeared since. Inadequate samples are rejected and recollected, never salvaged.

A patient who received red cells two weeks ago is booked for transfusion this afternoon. The only sample held in the transfusion laboratory was drawn five days ago and gave a negative antibody screen. How should the technologist proceed?

A 6 mL EDTA tube submitted for a group and screen contains roughly 0.5 mL of blood, and small clots are visible along the tube wall when it is inverted. The patient is stable on the ward. What is the appropriate action?

TM-PT-24

Working out a red cell phenotype

Phenotyping asks which antigens a set of red cells actually carries. The technologist follows the antiserum insert exactly, since some reagents work at immediate spin while others need thirty-seven degrees or an antiglobulin phase, and each run carries its own positive and negative controls plus a diluent control where the method demands one. Results are read against the patient's transfusion history, because cells transfused within the last three months make a serological type unreliable. Phenotypes confirm that a suspected antibody is an alloantibody and guide the choice of antigen-negative units for future transfusion.

A patient who has just formed a new antibody with anti-E specificity is phenotyped to confirm the antibody is an alloantibody. The Rh typing results are shown in [TABLE]. Which conclusion do these results support?

A donor red cell unit is being typed for the Jk(a) antigen using a licensed antiserum whose insert requires an indirect antiglobulin phase. What must be set up alongside the antiserum for the typing result to be reportable?

TM-PT-28

Detecting red cell antigens and antibodies

This is the core bench work: ABO forward and reverse grouping, Rh(D) typing with weak D testing where policy requires it, antibody screening by indirect antiglobulin technique, and identification on a panel when the screen is positive. Each phase detects something different, since immediate spin picks up cold-reacting IgM while thirty-seven degrees and the antiglobulin phase find the clinically significant IgG antibodies that destroy transfused cells. Washing quality, incubation time and the addition of check cells to every negative antiglobulin tube decide whether a negative result can be trusted at all.

An 82-year-old man is grouped before elective surgery. The forward typing is clear-cut, but the reverse group shows no reaction with either reagent cell [TABLE]. He has no history of transplant or transfusion. Which explanation is most likely?

Every tube in an antibody screen reads negative after the antiglobulin phase. IgG-coated check cells are added to each tube, centrifuged and read, and they too remain negative. What does this tell the technologist about the screen?

TM-PT-29

Deciding whether donor blood suits the patient

Compatibility testing joins a specific unit to a specific patient. When the antibody screen is negative, two concordant ABO determinations are on file and there is no antibody history, an immediate-spin or validated computer crossmatch is sufficient. A clinically significant antibody, present now or recorded in the past, changes the rules: antigen-negative units must be selected and a full antiglobulin crossmatch performed. An incompatible crossmatch is investigated rather than overridden, and emergency issue of uncrossmatched group O units follows a written protocol with the ordering physician's authorisation documented.

A patient's current antibody screen is negative, two concordant ABO determinations are on file, and no antibody has ever been recorded. The laboratory information system has been validated for compatibility testing. Which crossmatch method allows these units to be issued without serological testing?

A patient has a historical record of anti-Jk(a) from an admission three years ago, although today's antibody screen is negative. Four units of red cells are ordered for surgery tomorrow. How should the units be selected and tested?

TM-PT-30

Testing and preparing the products themselves

Attention also has to fall on the products. Donor red cell units are confirmed for ABO and Rh where policy requires it, and every unit is inspected before issue for clots, haemolysis, unusual colour, leaks and a damaged segment line, with expiry date and storage temperature checked at the same time. Some patients need modified components: irradiated units to prevent transfusion-associated graft versus host disease, washed cells for severe reactions to plasma proteins, or small aliquots for neonates. Each modification, inspection and release decision is recorded against the unit number.

A unit of red cells returned unused from a ward has a dark purple discolouration, and the plasma layer above the cells looks brown. The unit is still within its expiry date and the segment line is intact. What should the technologist do?

A father wishes to give red cells for his son, who is scheduled for major surgery next week. The hospital accepts the collection as a directed donation and the unit is ABO compatible. Which modification must be applied to this unit?

TM-PT-40

Reading the specimen's appearance before testing

Appearance is data. Red plasma may mean in vivo destruction or simply a traumatic draw, and either way free haemoglobin can hide the in vitro haemolysis that signals a complement-binding antibody, so a fresh sample is normally requested. Milky, lipaemic plasma makes a cell button hard to read and is easily mistaken for a weak reaction, while deep icterus discolours the supernatant and interferes in much the same way. The technologist grades the appearance, decides whether testing can proceed or the sample must be recollected, and documents the finding with the result.

A sample sent for crossmatching has visibly red plasma after centrifugation. The collector has noted that the draw was difficult and that a small-bore needle was used with considerable suction. Why should a fresh sample be requested before testing?

Plasma from a patient receiving an intravenous lipid emulsion is milky white, and the reverse grouping cell buttons cannot be graded with confidence. The sample was drawn from the arm carrying the running infusion. What is the best first step?

Back to all transfusion medicine areas in the Transfusion Medicine study guide.

MLTPrep is an independent study resource. Not affiliated with or endorsed by CAMLPR. Always confirm current requirements with CAMLPR directly.